Friday, July 15, 2022
TV Review: Ms. Marvel - Living the Dream
Sunday, July 10, 2022
Movie Review: "Thor: Love and Thunder" - Ragnarok 2, Electric Boogaloo
For all intents and purposes, Chris Hemsworth's Thor is the last Phase One leading MCU hero standing with "Love and Thunder" marking his fourth solo film. Following the success of "Ragnarok", it was obvious that director Taika Waititi would return for any follow-up. So does lightning quite literally strike twice here? Well, there's a bit of give and take.
Obviously the tone from "Ragnarok" carries over, but even some of the story beats in "Love and Thunder" are similar to its predecessor. To name just a few, we have Thor briefly working with other heroes who have their own series, a silly side villain (though to Russell Crowe's credit, his depiction of Zeus is more accurate than the Hercules Disney animated film), and a main antagonist with a death motif.
In many regards though, there are many aspects where "Love and Thunder" shines better. For starters, there's the music which continues Waititi's use of classic rock for his Thor films. While "Ragnarok" used Led Zepplin's "Immigrant Song" for two pivotal scenes, we now have quite a selection of Guns N' Roses songs to give more variety and more of an "umph" to certain scenes.
More importantly though, I feel there's more emotion to the plot this time around in two particular ways. The first is the relationship between Thor and Jane Foster, with Natalie Portman returning to reprise her role and now wielding Mjolnir herself. While we haven't seen Jane since "The Dark World" and we can only guess about how Portman's relationship with Marvel soured afterwards, I really enjoyed having her back with this film. Waititi does a great job at recapping their relationship, goes into more detail about her and Thor drifted apart, and makes the viewer fall in love and root for them all over again. I will say that of all the Guns N' Roses songs used for the film, I feel it was a missed opportunity not to include "Patience" in regard to the two.
Then you have Christian Bale as Gorr the God Butcher, our main villain. Sometimes I forget how much Bale puts into his roles, and Gorr is no different. Bale delivers what is probably the scariest MCU villain to date, both in his look and a performance that can be mesmerizing to take in. With the Necrosword, Gorr is cursed with both his body and mind seemingly being ravaged as he works toward his goal of killing all gods. But there's definitely more of a sympathetic aspect to him compared to Hela, where you understand what's motivating him and still feel for him even as the film reaches its climax.
In terms of the action, I don't think there's one bad fight piece in this entire film with some of the most brilliant choreography and cinematography we've seen yet in the MCU. When it comes to the comedy though, it doesn't always land quite as well as it did with "Ragnarok". It can get a little grating at times with the most annoying aspect to me being the damn screaming goats and I wish that meme would just die off already.
Everyone who's returned from previous films does a great job here but I really have to hand it to Chris Hemsworth. Whenever we see Thor in a Marvel film, it's always different as we see the character progress. "Love and Thunder" shows him still emotionally dealing with events from past films and now that he's passed rulership of New Asgard to Valkyrie, he's looking for purpose. This film is essentially Thor's midlife crisis and Hemsworth does a good job at showing that as his character appears more unsure of himself than we've ever seen him before. With how the film ends and Hemsworth seemingly still on board for more, it'll be interesting to see how Thor will be when we see him again.
While I do seem to be giving more praise than criticism comparing "Love and Thunder" to "Ragnarok" as I hinted at at the beginning, I honestly think "Ragnarok" is still the better of the two. "Love and Thunder" does improve on a lot of what "Ragnaork" did, but it does still feel like a copy in some ways. And to me, "Ragnarok" still serves as a grand conclusion to Thor's original trilogy while "Love and Thunder" makes it clear there's still story to tell. Whichever film you prefer, it's clear that Taika Waititi is the best fit for this corner of the MCU.
Monday, June 20, 2022
Series Analysis: Power Rangers Beast Morphers
Friday, June 10, 2022
TV Review: "Young Justice: Phantoms" - 'Heroes in Crisis' Done Right
What sets this season apart structure wise is that while there is a season long story, it's split up into six arcs, the final arc being a converging point of the previous five. I kind of liked this process as it gives those like myself who prefer to space out their series viewing over a few days clear groupings to watch episodes in. And while the cast continues to be vast, the main focus of the season and each arc is on the original members of the Young Justice team (as seen in the poster above) as they eventually all come together for the final arc. Considering that this season takes place ten years in universe since the series first began, it felt like a nice way to celebrate the show and team's long run with plenty of flashbacks and parallels to boot.
Monday, May 9, 2022
Movie Review: Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness - Multiverse Theory's a Witch
Coming off the heels of "Spider-Man: No Way Home", there's a lot of hype for the Doctor Strange sequel as it continues to explore the concept of the multiverse within the Marvel Cinematic Universe. As "Multiverse of Madness" attempts to both continue Strange's character journey and build up the inevitable multiversal war, the film does succeed but not without faltering somewhat along the way.
In terms of Strange's arc in the film, Benedict Cumberbatch does a good job at conveying his internal conflict as the character wrestles with the choices he's made across the movies, both personal and for the "greater good". As he learns of different versions of himself, it really raises questions about his morality and based on the ending, one of them will be if it will only go so far.
Without spoiling too much, the Scarlet Witch is the main villain of the film as Wanda officially breaks bad. Elizabeth Olsen outdoes herself from "WandaVision" as her character's story seems to come to its natural conclusion. It creates a nice parallel with Strange's story about how far one would go to achieve their goals, again, whether they be personal or for the "greater good". That being said, "Multiverse of Madness" was the first real test for Marvel about whether one truly needs to view the Disney+ series when their plot elements eventually spill over into the films to grasp the story better (taking into account that not everyone has Disney+). Sadly, it fails with this instance. While the film does discuss the events of "WandaVision", you'll have a deeper appreciation of the story and understanding of Wanda's motivation after having watched it since it's without a doubt the most crucial part of her character journey.
The rest of the main cast is rounded out well by Benedict Wong once again killing it as Wong, Xochitl Gomez carving out her place in the MCU's next generation as America Chavez, and Rachel McAdams having a more prominent role as Christine Palmer compared to the first film.
Director Sam Raimi is known for his work on the original Spider-Man trilogy and the Evil Dead series. With "Multiverse of Madness", he's able to bring both his lighthearted and demonic touches to the film resulting in some of the most creative imagery seen in an MCU film, especially on the latter category. Marvel succeeds in what they wanted to be their first horror film, with it at times being very graphic, unsettling, and packed with so many jump-scares that they seem bent on giving you a heart attack.
Of course, the main draw and most hype toward this movie was the multiverse aspect as the rumor mill for this movie had people speculating on what new characters would be introduced and what former non-MCU Marvel stars would be returning. It does seem that after seeing all the big screen Spider-Men together in "No Way Home", people were expecting a smorgasbord of cameos; I won't deny I had some thoughts on the matter myself (particularly of the Deadpool variety). My point is, please temper your expectations. With what we do get though, I felt very satisfied with who does end up appearing, but not so much with what happens to them; if anything, it at least opens up sacred timeline versions for some of these characters to appear later on.
Going off that though, I'm a little disappointed that Chiwetel Ejiofor's return as Mordo is that of a variant and not the one from the first film. It seems implied Strange did battle with his version off screen, but it leaves the set-up from the post-credits scene still without any real payoff. Which is what brings me to the main issue I feel with "Multiverse of Madness". While it continues Strange's story, it doesn't feel like a continuation of the first film whereas the hype of the multiverse will disappoint those expecting more. While I feel the film does succeed in what it wanted to do and have it both ways, one could see one aspect overshadowing the other.
Overall, "Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness" is a very entertaining and bloodcurdling film bolstered by Strange and Wanda's storylines and another taste of the MCU multiverse. The only advice I can give going in is not to expect another "Endgame" level film just yet.
Thursday, May 5, 2022
TV Review: Moon Knight - Split meets The Mummy
Sunday, March 6, 2022
Movie Review: The Batman - Justice Rises
Since the first trailer dropped at DC FanDome 2020, it was clear we were in for something special with Matt Reeves' "The Batman." And for me personally, there was a certain kind of excitement for the first solo Batman film in 10 years outside the larger scope of the main DCEU. Well, if you still had doubts about this movie because of certain casting or design choices, you can lay them aside. The hype is real as a unique new take on the Dark Knight has arrived.
Director Matt Reeves has delivered on so many fronts. The Gotham City presented is a perfect mix of the gothic nature of Tim Burton's films and the grounded reality of Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy; it's really the first time since "Batman Begins" where I've felt Gotham had its own landscape and atmosphere. I think the fact that we start the story with Batman already being established also helps make this world feel like its own and not just trying to fit Batman in our's. Story wise, Reeves has crafted a grand mystery and deep conspiracy to uncover; while there's a lot to unpack within this nearly 3 hour movie (which means you can probably get even more out of subsequent viewings), you'll be completely immersed not only thanks to the film's tone, but also to the engaging characters with no performances not to like. I also have to give a lot of praise to Michael Giacchino's score, who joins the ranks of Danny Elfman and Hans Zimmer of iconic Batman movie composers, creating unique themes for Batman, Catwoman, and Riddler.
While I've talked before about the film's comic inspirations back in my "Ego" review, my first viewing of the film brought to mind which ones are the most prominent. The heaviest influence on the film from what I could see were the "Earth One" series from Geoff Johns and Gary Frank along with the neo-noir writing style of Frank Miller's "Year One" with a splash of the Telltale video games (that last one making a certain twist in the film honestly not much of shock to me). Put them all together though, and it certainly brings a live action Batman not seen before.
As previously mentioned, I couldn't think of one performance I didn't like from this film. It's such as star-studded cast with Andy Serkis as Alfred, Zoe Kravitz as Selina Kyle, Jeffrey Wright as Gordon, Colin Farrel as Penguin, and John Turturro as Carmine Falcone. But of course, it's our main protagonist and antagonist who shine brightest.
* Like Michael Keaton and Ben Affleck before him, Robert Pattinson had a lot of hate to overcome in his Batman casting, mostly due to a certain series of films he starred in (and again, it's really time to get over that). Like his predecessors, Pattinson has risen above and delivered a new take on the character that will stand the test of time. Pattinson's Batman is probably the most intense portrayal of the character yet, as the deep seeded anger of the character exudes whenever he's on screen. There's also this raw realism to his fighting style that brings Charlie Cox's Daredevil to mind, where even if you get a hit in on him, he'll make sure you'll get hit back harder. Plus, while it can be scary for Batman just to appear, there's a feeling of dread that can arise just from hearing his footsteps as he approaches. His Bruce Wayne portrayal is also quite different in that he'd rather not be Bruce Wayne; this struggle of balance is reminiscent of Keaton's version, but Pattinson's Bruce hasn't reached the point of caring about that, wishing to be Batman 24/7. It's a good starting point for this version of the character as future sequels can show how Bruce can change, doing good for the city under his real name while also realizing that Batman has to be more than just an outlet for his childhood trauma. I also loved his relationships with other characters, from his partnership with Gordon (which is probably the strongest we've seen between the two characters before on film), his budding romance with Selina, and the strained father-son dynamic with Alfred (which culminates in a scene between the two that nearly got me chocked up).
* Paul Dano delivers a terrifying performance as the Riddler. As a terrorist bringing Gotham to the edge, it reminds me of Heath Ledger's Joker, but not as refined and rough around the edges. Since Dano did study serial killers for the role, I found his performance very believable and how such a person would behave in real life. And while this version is vastly different from Jim Carrey's in "Batman Forever", I surprising found a similarity between the two; whether it was Bruce or Batman, Riddler felt a one-sided kinship with the man he would eventually call his enemy. In Dano's case, his Riddler is inspired by Batman, believing himself a hero and taking the crusade against the city's corrupt further, even becoming a cult of personality himself in the process; I can't recall a villain in a Batman or comic book movie that was able to create a following out of normal citizens.
And while not technically a character, I loved this film's interpretation of the Batmobile. For one, its design is truly believable for an early years Batman in a grounded setting. More importantly though, I can't remember when a Batmobile can stoke as much fear and be as unstoppable as Batman himself, which isn't surprising since Stephen King's "Christine" was cited as inspiration in its depiction. The sound of its engine being the loudest thing you can hear whenever the Batmobile was onscreen and how it reverberated through the theater was a nice touch.
Overall, with Matt Reeves and Robert Pattinson at the helm, it would appear that the future of the Dark Knight on film (and its HBO Max spin-offs) is a bright one.







_poster.jpg)