Wednesday, September 4, 2013

The Mind of a Madman



In my second Joker-related-school-project post of the week, I thought I'd share a paper from my class on memory in which I analyzed the famous graphic novel, Batman: The Killing Joke. Enjoy.


The Mind of a Madman

                        “All it takes is one bad day to reduce the sanest man alive to lunacy.”

The Joker, Batman: The Killing Joke.

            In his classic 1988 graphic novel, Batman: The Killing Joke, author Alan Moore analyzed the mindset of the Dark Knight’s psychotic arch nemesis, the Joker. In doing so, Moore created a tragic origin for the super villain, depicting him as a once normal person until a series of unfortunate events led to his clown like disfigurement and a psychotic break, becoming the homicidal maniac people recognize him as today. While the Joker remembers some events throughout the story, he is implied to be an unreliable narrator, and admits his own uncertainty as to how he became the way he is. The only thing certain is that the Joker went through a traumatic experience that drove him insane and forget the life he had before. Such a concept is analyzed by Maria I.  Medved and Jens Brockmeier in their article “Continuity Amid Chaos: Neurotrauma, Loss of Memory, and Sense of Self.” They examine the idea of neurotrauma, which is how the brains of people who experience it become “strange” and their sense of self is changed. While only a fictional character, the Joker, as depicted by Moore, is not only a prime example of how neurotrauma can drastically alter a person’s mind, but that he may deserve the reader’s sympathy, given he did go through something horrific to become what he is now.

            According to Medved and Brockmeier, people who are afflicted with mental illness and disability eventually experience a crisis, a threat not only one’s self and identity, but also their changed view of the world (Medved 469). Some individuals have found that narrative helps them sort out and find meaning within these changes (Medved 469). Narrative can also be seen as instructions of what and what not to do in life as a way to integrate a person back into normal society (Medved 469). Also referred to as “restitution stories”, narratives are believed to help a person restore their former selves at some point (Medved 470). However, others who may have difficulty working retrieving their former self experience in “chaos narratives” and “quest stories”, the latter of which being when a person’s illness creates a new identity for them (Medved 470). This neurotrauma can be the result of some affliction to a certain area of the brain, and in turn diminish one’s ability to remember and narrate, which can radically alter any attempt an identity construction (Medved 470). The brains of such individuals become transmogrified, strange, and acquire new habits (Medved 470). Even then, there could be some sentimental value for the “lost self”, even though they may not know exactly who that was (Medved 470). Essentially, Medved and Brockmeier insinuate that recovery of the mind and sense of self following a traumatic experience can only be done so by the person directly affected, as long as they are actually willing and able to open the door to their past.

            In relation to the Joker, however, it seems he would not care for Medved and Brockmeier’s ideas about recovery. He has his own feelings towards memory and madness:

Remembering’s dangerous. I find the past such a worrying place […] Memories can be vile, repulsive little brutes […] But can we live without them? Memories are what our reason is based upon. If we can’t face them, we deny reason itself! Although, why not? We aren’t contractually tied down to rationality! […] Madness is the emergency exit…you can just step outside and close the door on all those dreadful things that happened.

The Joker, Batman: The Killing Joke.

It is not just that Joker does not want to look back at his past, but that he is unable to remember it correctly. Quite specifically, he cannot recall quite exactly how he became the Joker in the first place: “Sometimes I remember it one way, sometimes another…If I’m going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice!” (Moore). He revels in his inability to remember his exact former self.

            To Medved and Brockmeier, the decreased self-awareness may not because of where there the brain is afflicted, but the “number […] of the lesions” that are associated with it (Medved 470). According to the Joker’s supposed origin, he had “one bad day” that drove him “as crazy as a coot” (Moore). He was once a struggling comedian who joined up with a couple of criminals to pull a heist at the chemical plant he used to work in order to have enough money to provide for his wife and future child (Moore). However, on the night of the heist, he was informed by the police beforehand that an electrical short had killed his wife and unborn child; he tried to pull out of the heist so he could, but stayed in due to threats from the two criminals (Moore). Everything went wrong in the heist though, as both criminals were shot by security, their blood splattering on the comedian, and the appearance of Batman scared him enough to jump into a vat of chemical that would drain outside the plant to escape (Moore). Once outside, he found that the chemicals had bleached his skin white and his hair green, and the shock of his appearance caused him to laugh uncontrollably (Moore). Losing his family, the fear of being killed himself, and his disfigurement could be considered the lesions that caused Joker’s decreased self-awareness, with so much happening to him that he cracked under the pressure. Trying to prove that this could happen to anyone, he attempted to do the same to Commissioner Gordon, by shooting Gordon’s daughter Barbara pointblank, kidnapping him, stripping him down nude, and forcibly showing him pictures he took of the wounded Barbara he also stripped down (Moore). Gordon would be unresponsive to the Joker afterwards, but was revealed to retain his sanity once Batman came to the rescue. If Joker had succeeded in driving Gordon mad though, the events he was put through would have been the lesions responsible for his trauma.

            Of the three types of narrative Medved and Brockmeier go over, the ones that would most relate to the Joker are the “chaos narrative” and the “quest story.” The “chaos narrative” is when an individual has “little discernible narrative order” that “makes it difficult for the sick to reflect on their illness experience” (Medved 470). As the Joker prefers to have a “multiple choice past” and admits to not being sure what happened to him, it shows he has difficulty creating an exact narrative of the traumatic experience that made him who he is. In addition, the “quest story”, as stated before, is described as when “people claim that their illnesses or disabilities have produced new identities” (Medved 470). Comparing the present day Joker to the supposed comedian he was before, one can see there are drastic differences in their characters. The comedian was a timid person only committing a crime to help his family, fearful for his life and of Batman; The Joker, on the other hand, takes joy in his crimes and the people he harms, as well as a fascination with Batman instead of a fear (Moore). The drastic change this man undergoes greatly demonstrates the idea of a radically altered identity and a transmogrified brain.

            While the Joker hates the idea of thinking about his past, his mind does seem to go there, as he has stated to remember it in different ways. This shows that he may have some, as Medved and Brockmeier have described, sentimental value of the life he had before, even if he cannot exactly recall what it was like. Even though the personalities of the Joker and the comedian are radically different, there are small similarities between the two. The man who would be Joker quit his job at the chemical plant to become a comedian, but was not very successful in his endeavors (Moore). Essentially, the man wanted to make people laugh. The Joker would also want to make people laugh, but with more lethal and psychological methods (Moore). To be more precise, Joker wants to make people see the world as a “black awful joke” the way he does and drive them as mad as he is, just as he tried to do with Gordon (Moore). In comparison, the comedian in an upset fit after an unsuccessful job interview thought his wife was accusing him of not being serious and treating their financial and living situation as a “big joke” (Moore). While the comedian saw life as serious and wanted to bring laughter into it, the Joker sees life as a big joke and wants to share the punch line with people by bringing them down to his level. The individual’s mindset may have changed vastly, but his goal remains the same in some way.

            While Medved and Brockmeier believe that narrative can help restore a person’s former self after their mind has an experience of neurotrauma, it is ultimately up to the individual themselves to recover what they lost. By the end of The Killing Joke, once the Joker’s plan is thwarted and has nothing else to play, he surrenders himself to Batman (Moore). In a moment of mercy, Batman pleads with the Joker to end the long war between the two of them that will most likely lead to both their deaths, offering to help the Joker in his rehabilitation and give him a normal life (Moore). In response, a seemingly remorseful Joker feels that it is “too late for that” (Moore). As Medved and Brockmeier point out, an individual may “[feel] uneasy being labeled as ‘brain-damaged,’ because they [believe] that this [would] further [negate] their sense of self” (Medved 471). The Joker may see accepting Batman’s help as an admission that something is wrong with himself, and goes against his claims that an escape from memory into madness brings about enlightenment. He would rather stay in that state of mind than recall the life he had before and whatever tragic event changed him so.

            The ideas of Medved and Brockmeier are certainly applicable to the mindset of the Joker depicted by Moore in The Killing Joke. The one aspect both pieces demonstrate is that the mind can be fragile and certain events can drastically alter who a person is and how their memory works. Despite all the terrible things he does, the Joker does deserve some sympathy, as it is assumed that he did live a normal life until that “one bad day.” While there is hope for a person to put the pieces of their former life back together, the process can only come from within, if they are willing to. For the Joker, he feels he is too far gone. The person he once was, whoever that may have been, cannot be revived.
 
Works Cited

Medved, Maria I., and Jens Brockmeier. "Continuity Amid Chaos: Neurotrauma, Loss of Memory, and Sense of Self." Qualitative Health Research. 18.469 (2008): 469-479. Print.

Moore, Alan. Batman: The Killing Joke. New York: DC Comics, 1988. Print.

No comments:

Post a Comment