Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Op/Ed: DC's "Rebirth" Should Have Happened Sooner (SPOILERS)


"I love this world. But there's something missing."
- Wally West


Happy days may be ahead as DC's "Rebirth" initiative has begun. Having read the one-shot special, I can say that it was probably one of the best comics I've read, with emotional moments (one in particular that gave me goosebumps) and setting up a bright future but also teasing a looming threat. Compared to when the New 52 started, going into "Rebirth", I have a lot of enthusiasm for what DC has planned. I'm even considering buying the "Rebirth" omnibus that will eventually come out, and maybe future trades for some series depending how I feel about the initial issues in the collection.
From my own personal standpoint though, I have to ask: what took so long? Now I've actually been planning a write-up about my feeling toward DC for over a year now but was waiting until the conclusion of Justice League's "Darkseid War" storyline to put it all together. "Rebirth" here was just the cherry on top. Buckle in, because this is going to be a long post.

Let's start all the way back in May 2014. DC had just wrapped up the "Forever Evil" event, with the final page teasing the Anti-Monitor claiming that he will destroy Darkseid. At the same time, the weekly series "Futures End" had begun, telling the story of Terry McGinnis/Batman Beyond traveling back 30 years to what would be five years from the present DCU to prevent the artificial intelligence Brother Eye from taking over the Earth. One of the events mentioned in the series was how after Earth 2 had been destroyed (which would be detailed in the subsequent and concurrent weekly series "Earth 2: World's End") by Darkseid, the survivors of that world had came to the Prime Earth through a boomtube. This lead to an all out war with Apokolips against the heroes of two worlds, the aftermath resulting in a very dark future as seen in the "Futures End" weekly.
Considering the looming presence of the Anti-Monitor, Darkseid's threat to both worlds and the tease of a crossover between the two, it appeared that DC was planning a big event that would detail the war mentioned in "Futures End", but have a different outcome with the Anti-Monitor's involvement and the time travel aspects. And considering 2015 would be the 30th Anniversary of "Crisis on Infinite Earths", which also featured the heroes of the multiverse fighting a major threat to all existence, it just seemed right.
But there was more. "Futures End" had another major threat in Brainiac, who appeared to become just as dangerous as Darkseid and the Anti-Monitor. Take a look at some of these connecting covers from "Futures End".

Take a close look at the red energy coming from Brainiac's hand. It's characters from the DC Universe before it rebooted with the New 52. It seemed that whatever DC was planning, their old universe would actually play a part in it. Picture it: the heroes of the New 52's Prime Earth and Earth 2 and the pre-Flashpoint DC Universe against the powers of Darkseid, Anti-Monitor, and Brainiac. If anything, it would have been more of a proper send-off for the old universe than "Flashpoint" gave us, as well as make the main New 52 Earth feel like the old Earth. Unfortunately though, what we got was very different.

DC had announced two different events, "Convergence" and "Darkseid War".
"Convergence" would be a two month weekly series culminating from the end of "Futures End" and "Earth 2: World's End". As a result of "Futures End", the survivors of Earth 2 don't teleport to Prime Earth, drifting through space on multiple life-ships. In addition, a group of Earth 2 heroes (Val-Zod/Superman, Thomas Wayne/Batman, Jay Garrick/Flash, Alan Scott/Green Lantern, Wildcat, and Dick Grayson) are somehow transported to Telos, Brainiac's living planet that contains cities he collected from past timelines from DC's history, from pre-Crisis Earths 1 and 2 to the pre-Flashpoint DCU and everything in between. With Brainiac's capture in "Futures End", Telos decides to take charge and forces the heroes from the cities collected to battle each other to see who is the strongest.
"Darkseid War" would by contrast be contained to the main "Justice League" book.

My thoughts on "Convergence" are that it started out interesting, kind of had a lull during the middle, but had a satisfying conclusion. Though if there's one thing I can't forgive it for, it's not showing the conversation Earth 2 Thomas Wayne had with pre-Flashpoint Bruce Wayne. That could have been a tear-jerking moment, but it just got glossed over.
However, the real heart of the "Convergence" event were the 40 2-part miniseries tying into it. Each week during the two months were dedicated to a past era of DC's history, so whichever era you grew up, you had a chance to read your favorite heroes again as you were familiar with them. For me personally, it was the weeks that showed the pre-Flashpoint heroes. While DC had continuity altering events before, they never had the significance that the New 52 did. The pre-Flashpoint DCU was the culmination of everything that came before. It was a joy reading and looking into some of these stories, like seeing Stephanie Brown as Batgirl, Dick Grayson and Barbara Gordon finally getting married, and Clark and Lois still together and having a child. It was definitely feeling like the last hurrah for the pre-Flashpoint DCU. So between this and the fact that I was rewatching the "Young Justice" animated series at the time, I had to ask, why did we have to lose all this history?

While I appreciate the New 52 for expanding my horizons and DC reading list, I couldn't help but wonder if DC still would have been able to create new jumping on points but not starting from scratch. I would say that probably half of the stories, at least in premise, told under the New 52 could have still happened in the old universe albeit with some changes, particularly the Batman and Green Lantern lines. There could have still been changes to the universe, whether they be costumes or origin stories, but only if necessary. For starters, there were many characters who had their history and relationships removed and restarted, including the pretty much every Teen Titan and former Batgirls Stephanie Brown and Cassandra Cain, who would be introduced years after the New 52's beginning. Yeah, there'd be none of that. "Superman and the Men of Steel" and "Batman: Zero Year" could still work since they took place in the past. "Justice League: Origin" though, I would set in the present, with the new League forming to face the returning Darkseid. As for costumes, Superman would retain his classic look (and still be with Lois to boot) and I actually liked Wonder Woman's "Odyssey" redesign (I don't know why it's a problem for her to have pants). Characters whose new designs could have worked were Batman, Nightwing, and Cyborg. Bruce was reestablished as the one and only Batman after sharing the role with Dick, who had been moving back to his Nightwing role. For Cyborg, he could have been be upgraded with Apokoliptic tech. I could go on, but that would warrant its own post, so I digress.

But back to what we actually got. Following "Convergence", DC began the DCYou era (a name I didn't really like; I would have gone with "Divergence"). Largely, a number of titles had very little to do with the aftermath of "Convergence" and continued to do what they were doing before, but with major shake-ups. Some examples include Superman slowly being depowered and his identity being revealed to the public and Bruce Wayne getting amnesia with Batman believed to be dead, leaving Jim Gordon to become the new city-sanctioned Batman. Aside from that, most other changes were just new costumes for Aquaman, Wonder Woman, Flash, etc.
The problem during this era though was DC's new stance of "creativity over continuity". Despite the changes going on in their solo books, the main Justice League book, which began "Darkseid War", seemed largely unaffected. It begged the question of when "Darkseid War" actually took place, before or after the events going on in other characters' books. I remained steadfast in my belief that "Darkseid War" happened before everything else. As it would turn out though, it happened after. There in lies the problem with "creativity over continuity". I like to have a sense of when stories take place in relation to each other as I'm reading them. Let me clarify with an example. After Bruce got his memory back and became Batman again, he was wearing a new costume. But as we see Bruce in "Darkseid War", he is clearly wearing his New 52 suit as he had been. In addition to that, Cyborg had also gotten a new design for DCYou, but he still had his previous look during "Darkseid War". However, there were some points where his DCYou look was used, only to go back to his old look later. But then you have the other characters who had gotten new suits for a little while, for seemingly no reason, only to go back to their previous original New 52 suits. It just seemed pointless.
In fact, a lot of aspects of the DC Universe between "Convergence" and "Rebirth" seemed pointless. Besides costume changes, any status quo shake-ups were undone in under a year. Superman losing his powers? Surprise, he got them back. Hal Jordan becoming a renegade and the rest of the Green Lantern Corps missing? Look, they're all back. Bruce getting amnesia and Gordon becoming Batman? Bruce is back and Gordon becomes Commissioner again. On top of that, Gordon got a hair cut and shaved his mustache while he was Batman, but he quickly and automatically looks like his old self by the end. Speaking for the stories themselves, powerless Superman was interesting at first but lasted a bit longer than it needed. And while Gordon as Batman was somewhat entertaining in the main Batman book, it wasn't as good in any other book he appeared in.
I mean, there were still some good times to be had in the DCYou era (some of those titles include Justice League, Grayson, and Robin: Son of Batman), but having shake-ups just for the sake of them and having them undone in a short period of time with seemingly no major impacts afterwards could really irk some readers. I was trying not to bring Marvel into this, but at least they're sticking with Sam Wilson as Captain America and Jane Foster as Thor for the foreseeable future.

In contrast to "Convergence" though, I really enjoyed the "Darkseid War" story in Justice League. It was very focused and its conclusion did a good job of setting up "Rebirth". It also dealt with characters from different worlds coming together, but in this case, it was the Justice League of Prime Earth and the remaining members of Earth 3's Crime Syndicate. So the multiverse aspect was still there.
That said, I still feel that "Convergence" and "Darkseid War" should have and somehow could have been merged into one event. Yes, "Convergence" was considered a "filler" event while DC was moving operations to the west coast, but it still had some ramifications, from the Telos planet becoming the new Earth 2 and the pre-Flashpoint Superman and his family secretly residing on Prime Earth.
To break it down, it would have been the New 52's heroes of Prime Earth and Earth 2, the Crime Syndicate of Earth 3, and the pre-Flashpoint heroes against Darkseid, Anti-Monitor, and Brainiac. Among the major ramifications would be the death of New 52 Superman, whose role would be filled by the pre-Flashpoint Superman, and the return of pre-Flashpoint Wally West. "Rebirth" could have been the aftermath of this event and set the next stage for the DC Universe.
Considering that people had a taste of the old DC universe again in the "Convergence" tie-ins and the goal of "Rebirth" being to re-establish legacy to the DC universe, it would have just made sense for one to lead into the other. I don't think we would have missed much if we just skipped over the DCYou era and jumped straight into "Rebirth" (especially since all the DCYou titles are being cancelled anyway).

Again, while I appreciate the New 52 for getting me more into DC, in some respects, I do agree with some of the criticisms it received. While there were still good stories, and many will attest to that, at times, the New 52 did feel dark and miserable, sometimes just for the sake of being new and different. To compare the past and the future, look at these two promo images from the pre-Flashpoint and Rebirth universes:


Do you know what I see in these images? Hope. Icons. Legacy. Heroes Together. And they actually look happy. Like they're waking up from a five year coma and ready to live again.

It's been a bumpy road since the New 52 began. There's been good and bad. But honestly, no era was perfect. It could just be a matter of opinion of what's best or maybe nostalgia clouds our minds and make us forget the bad moments. I'm sure the "Rebirth" era will have its misfires, but at the moment, the future looks bright. You just have to have hope. As the Blue Lanterns say "All will be well".

Friday, May 27, 2016

Movie Review: "X-Men: Apocalypse" - Third Ones Aren't Always the Worst (Minor Spoilers)


After "X-Men: Days of Future Past", many fans were filled with hope that with almost everything fair game again, we would get X-Men movies that would feel more like the comics and cartoons. Between the introduction of Apocalypse to the franchise and young actors cast to play Cyclops, Jean Grey, Storm, Nightcrawler, and Angel, it seems like it was about to happen. And being set in the 80's, it looked to be the movie I expected we would get when "First Class" was still in early pre-production. As more and more info came out about the film, I believed it would be the X-Men film we've waited 16 years for. So does it live up to the hype? In some ways, very much so. In others, it may make you wanting more in the next one.

I'll start out by saying that it's a very special effects heavy movie. There's a lot of destruction, and like Jeff Goldblum says in the "Independence Day: Resurgence" trailer, "they like to hit the monuments." Within the X-Men franchise though, you could compare the major special effects to X3, but there's actually some heart behind it in "Apocalypse".
Like in DOFP, I feel "Apocalypse" pushes the limits of the PG-13 rating with some pretty cringe-worthy deaths and fight scenes, which I like. They aren't playing it safe like they used to, and they do some things I'm not sure even Marvel would do (although in comparison, the humor is about on the same level as Marvel).

Let's go over characters now, starting with the eponymous villain. Oscar Isaac delivers a pretty powerful performance as Apocalypse in both personality and actions. He reminds me somewhat of Ultron in that he wants to make the world what he views as a better place under his rule with only the strong surviving to serve him.
As mentioned before, we're introduced to younger versions of characters we saw in the original trilogy. It was really nice seeing a young Scott and Jean, from how they cope with their powers and how they meet. In my opinion, they finally get some shining moments that I felt were missing from the characters before. I won't spoil how, but I think it's probably obvious. I could really believe they grow up to be the older versions we've met before. I could say the same for Nightcrawler as well. He's kind of the comic relief much like in "X2" as well as retains his religious views, although he doesn't get as much focus this time around, despite still being entertaining. The younger Storm is interesting and understandable with her character arc, but I felt she was lacking when using her powers, at least compared to her older version. Let's just hope that this version doesn't inexplicably lose her accent like Halle Berry did.
However, the ones who truly suffer in this movie are Angel and Psylocke. More so with Angel though. While he certainly does more here than in X3, he was very underdeveloped in comparison. With X3, we saw he was conflicted about his mutant powers with what he and his father wanted for him. I don't know what Angel's deal is in "Apocalypse" though. And besides that, he kind of dies in a pretty sucky way. As for Psylocke, while it's nice to see her more prominent and actually more like her comic-self than in X3 (like actually using her powers), she too was underdeveloped. However, she may have a chance for redemption in a future movie.

Now let's talk about the main ensemble that started back in "First Class". I can't really say much about MacAvoy's Xavier or Hoult's Beast, because they're about what you expected from the previous movies, though it's nice to see Xavier finally bald.
Jennifer Lawrence has gotten a lot of flack from previews for this movie for hardly appearing in Mystique's blue form in any footage. Like, so much for "mutant and proud". It's no secret that behind the scenes, she doesn't like to go through the make-up process. I will say though that the film does give her a good reason to hide her true self. Since saving President Nixon in the previous film, Mystique has been deemed a hero by many young mutants. It is nice to see how she becomes more accepting of this role though. I know some people don't like how they've made Mystique more of a hero in these films since "First Class", but like a lot of things in this franchise, I try to accept how they do things and not worry about how they differed from the comics.
If anyone gets the most development though, it's Fassbender as Magneto. I wasn't as sympathetic toward him in DOFP, but with this film, I was feeling the same pain for him that I did back in "First Class". I really don't want to go full spoilers about why specifically, but I think you'll feel the same as I did. I had a friend compare Magneto and Apocalypse's relationship to that of Vader and Sidious, and I have to say it was pretty apt.
Overall, this film brings a good conclusion to all four of these character's arcs.

Two characters truly stood out though. The first of course is Quicksilver. Having one of the most entertaining moments back in DOFP, it was without question he would come back. Not bad for a character Fox added last minute just to screw with Marvel. This time around, he has an even more epic slow-mo scene than his kitchen scene in DOFP. I don't think anyone will be left disappointed. We also get a more personal aspect this time around with him wanting to connect with Magneto, who is indeed revealed to be his father. It's going to be interesting how their relationship plays out in future films.
And of course, Hugh Jackman returns as Wolverine. Yeah I know, it's the eighth freaking time in a row, but you can't deny the guy knows how to play the role. And while it's just a cameo, this is probably the best Wolverine moment out of the whole franchise. Remember how he fought the soldiers invading the mansion in X2? Well here, his berserker rage is amped up even further. Like I said before, the film pushes its PG-13 limits, and Wolverine in this film is no exception. People won't be complaining about bloodless Wolverine fight scenes after this.

One aspect I didn't like though was how Moira MacTaggert (reprised by Rose Bryne) was used in the film. Apparently Charles wiped her memories of him and the others completely, and it was really frustrating to watch. I mean, I thought all he did was wipe out her memories from before they headed to the mansion in "First Class". I didn't think he would go all "Superman II". And even in the end, he lets her remember what happened, so what was even the point?

In some ways, it kind of feels like Bryan Singer is still cleaning up some of the messes the franchise made while he was gone. X3 introduced so many characters just for the hell of it, and while I feel this film does bring in a lot of characters, they still feel important (well with the exception of Blob). And a lot like X2, Singer had a chance to do Wolverine's origin again, succeeding in about five minutes what his actual "Origins" film failed to do in about two hours.

As exciting as this film was, I feel that "Days of Future Past" is still the best film of the franchise. I mean, "Apocalypse" was pretty damn close, but it has its problems. And while I did feel "Apocalypse" succeeded in doing things the franchise hadn't done before and continuing to embrace it's comic book roots, I don't think we'll get a TRUE X-Men film until next time. The fact that they actually get their own unique suits (which I wish they would have kept out of previews so we could be surprised) in the end and training against Sentinels in the Danger Room was a pretty good indicator.

Overall, fans of the franchise will no doubt enjoy what this film delivers, both satisfying them and leaving them wanting more the next time around.

RATING: 9/10

My Personal X-Men Film Rankings:
1. X-Men: Days of Future Past
2. X-Men: Apocalypse
3. Deadpool
4. X-Men: First Class
5. X2
6. The Wolverine
7. X-Men
8. X-Men: The Last Stand
9. X-Men Origins: Wolverine

Saturday, May 7, 2016

Movie Review: "Captain America: Civil War" - 'Glory and Gore Go Hand in Hand'


If you had told me two years ago after "Winter Soldier" that the third Captain America movie would be based on "Civil War", include a dozen heroes, AND feature Spider-Man, I would have said you were a crazy fanboy expecting too much from a character's solo movie. But here we are now, all those things happened, and as everyone expected, it's the best film yet to come from Marvel, being a culmination of everything that's come so far and setting up quite a bit for the future, having even more of an impact than the preceding Avengers film.

If I was going to put a ratio on it, I would say this film was 67% of a Captain America movie and 33% of an Avengers movie. It mostly builds itself off of Captain America's solo movies and could be seen as a true conclusion to the character's film trilogy (unless we get a fourth movie in the future). At the same time though, we have the inclusion of other heroes who do get some pretty good focus while not hindering Cap's.

Last year, I expected a bit much from "Age of Ultron" to directly set up "Civil War". It did, but in subtle ways. I've come to realize that with an Avengers movie, it needed to end on a positive note. Captain America's movies, however, are more of the darker political thrillers that appear to have the bigger impacts. In this movie, we get a closer examination of the consequences of events from other movies, as well as this one, showing the effects on the public and the casualties that resulted.
I went into this movie being on Team Cap, much like how I was in the comics, but this movie did a really good job of making us see things from Iron Man's side. They even base a scene right from the comics of a mother coming up to Stark and blaming him and the other heroes for the death of her son.
Considering this movie is about the government wanting more say in the Avengers' activities, the ironic thing is that the idea of the Avengers in the movies started out as a government initiative through SHIELD before going off on their own. Hell, even "The Ultimates", which initially and partially served as inspiration for the first Avengers film, were a government based team.

The character interactions are truly the heart of the film. Given we've had 12 movies building up to this movie, it really adds to the heartbreak of watching these characters who are friends going at each other. While there's the main conflict between Steve and Tony, another relationship focused on is Wanda/Scarlet Witch and Vision. As comic readers know, these characters marry, and said romance between them is prominent. They are quite likely the undisputed strongest members of the Avengers, and they know it. Something that was really hinted at with Wanda in "Age of Ultron" was her moments of losing control of her powers, such as when she briefly read Vision's mind while in the cradle and when she decimated a few Ultron bots while screaming in agony over her brother's death. This movie takes it further, considering her loss of control over powers results in a number of casualties and more incidents later. Vision, who seems to have more control over his powers despite not knowing the capabilities of his Infinity Stone (oh I feel that's gonna be an emotional moment when Thanos comes for it), is protective of Wanda, even when they're on oppostie sides, surprising himself how much he cares.

We get two new heroes introduced to the MCU in this film. The first is T'Challa, the Black Panther. I tell you, he is a character you don't want to mess with. His combat skills make him one of the best fighters we've seen in the MCU. Besides that, he goes through a good character arc from being set on revenge to letting it subside to do the right thing. I really look forward to his solo movie in a few years (though I bet he'll have a few guest stars based on the mid-credits scene).
But of course, there's one character everyone's been waiting for, and who I was most excited to see, in a Marvel movie: Spider-Man. Portrayed now by Tom Holland, we have the youngest Peter Parker we've seen yet in film and who I would say is the perfect mix of Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield. He's able to dish out the quips between some banter with both Stark and Rogers as well as annoying the other heroes with how much he talks (and he is hilarious by the way). At the same time though, he's about as awkward as you'd expect from a teenage hero who's moved up to the big leagues. In a way, he seems out of place among the other heroes, but it feels natural considering he sticks around New York and now he's thrust into a battle between heroes who have a global focus. As for the costume, much like the Amazing Spider-Man 2 suit, it's the closest adaptation we've had, but even more. The way the eyes move are great too (I do wonder how they work though). As much as me and many fans complained about not seeing enough Spidey in footage before the movie's release, I'm glad they kept him under wraps for as long as they did, because it made me appreciate him even more. Something I liked during his first meeting with Stark was when he was asked how he got his powers and replies "It's a long story". It's a good reference to how many times people have seen the origin while also keeping the promise that they'll just breeze over it. Even here, we do get a subtle way explaining why he's Spider-Man, but without referencing Uncle Ben or "With great power comes great responsibility". If there's one thing I'm not sure about, it's that he and Aunt May live in an apartment instead of a house. I know it's not a big deal, but it's just different from every other version of Spider-Man I've seen. Needless to say, I look forward to his solo movie next year.

While the main conflict of the film is between the heroes, the main villain of the movie is based on Baron Zemo. I say 'based on' because he's very different from his comics version. I really don't want to get into much detail without spoiling much, but he's a very unique villain for the MCU. Let's just say he's not motivated with world domination, and we may be seeing him again if anything with the Thunderbolts is planned.

The action in this movie is even better than in "Winter Soldier". The hand-to-hand combat is still top notch and we get the most amazing superhero melee that I think even the Infinity War films (or whatever they're going to be renamed) will have a hard time outdoing. But of course, there's the climactic battle with Tony against Steve and Bucky. It gets pretty damn brutal and if your heart wasn't breaking watching the movie before, it will at this point.

Like I mentioned before but won't go into detail about, this movie, much like the Civil War of the comics, has a major impact on the future of the MCU (but handled MUCH better here). The split between the heroes will continue on, and while I'm sure these effects will continue to be felt in characters' solo movies while including guest stars, it does make me wish we could get a few extra movies that focus on these separate Avengers teams before they undoubtedly reunite in Infinity War.
And as much as I loved "Batman v Superman", I will admit that "Civil War" was the better film. I still don't understand though how critics can hate one and love the other when they're almost exactly the same. You'd understand what I mean if you saw both films.
Overall, whether this if your first Marvel movie or you've been here since "Iron Man", you'll most likely come down with some major feels while watching.

RATING: 10/10

Updated Marvel Cinematic Universe Film Rankings:
1. Captain America: Civil War
2. Avengers: Age of Ultron
3. Captain America: The Winter Soldier
4. The Avengers
5. Guardians of the Galaxy
6. Ant-Man
7. Iron Man 3
8. Thor
9. Captain America: The First Avenger
10. Iron Man
11. The Incredible Hulk
12. Iron Man 2
13. Thor: The Dark World