I had intended this to be a regular review of the storyline, but as the title of the post indicates, it's not worth the effort.
"Hush 2" (stupidly stylized as "H2SH") saw the creative team of writer Jeph Loeb and artist Jim Lee reunite for the sequel to their original 2002-03 Batman story. This is despite the fact the character of Hush had been a recurring villain as recent as the end of Peter Tomasi's last run on Detective Comics in 2020. And if any story was worth being a true follow-up, it would be Paul Dini's "Heart of Hush" from 2008. Regardless, the "Hush 2" we did get has been poorly received and met with numerous delays. It's basically "All Star Batman and Robin" all over again, which Lee also worked on with another acclaimed Batman writer past his prime, Frank Miller.
"Hush 2" was meant to run from March 2025 to August 2025 to conclude that current volume of the main Batman book before it was relaunched in September with Matt Fraction taking over as the writer. Yes, ending and immediately restarting a book with a new issue one is still a frustrating practice of the big two, but I give DC credit that they're more restrained compared to Marvel in recent years. To mark the occasion, we would see Bruce don an updated batsuit (with Tim and Damian getting new Robin suits too) which would also appear in the rest of the Bat-books and the broader DC universe. Couple that with the fact that variant covers of the final and first issues of their respective volumes were meant to connect, this implied "Hush 2" would have major ramifications.
As I mentioned though, delays started to occur with the release schedule of "Hush 2". Now normally, if a book was behind schedule, particularly one with line-wide implications, it would in turn delay what's meant to come in the aftermath. I don't know if reviews had played a factor, but when September came around, DC went as scheduled with Matt Fraction's new Batman #1 despite the fact "Hush 2" only reached part four of its six issue run. By the time part six finally arrived this May, Fraction's run had reached issue nine.
Fraction's run and the other Batbooks by September were meant to take place after "Hush 2". Throw in the fact that none of those books have made any reference to that story and it begs the question of what the point of it even is. DC obviously didn't even care enough to make sure it was finished before moving on to what came after. If it weren't for completionists like myself, especially since it was part of the main Batman book, many more would have dropped this story without a second thought.
But here's the real kicker. After fourteen months to get these six issues out, the story STILL isn't over! Part six not only has no plot resolutions but ends on a cliffhanger with a tease for "H2SH 2", which read out loud would be "Hush 2 2" (do you see what I mean now with that stylization?). Despite the plan to lead into Fraction's run, this was apparently always meant to be a twelve-issue story like the original. Artist Jim Lee has said the second half will be its own miniseries and will have a consistent release schedule once everything's completed. But again, what is the point? Considering the time it took for the first half to come out, who knows how long it will take for the second and how far ahead the Batman books will be when its finished? And I don't see many readers eagerly waiting for it considering how the story's gone so far. This is why I'm not giving "Hush 2" a full review. I can't take waiting on a story that so far has been nonsensical and ultimately doesn't matter. Though if it's anything like "All Star", I would be surprised if a promised continuation to wrap up the story actually materializes.
However, there is one plot point of "Hush 2" that warrants discussion. A plot point I've been boiling over for about a year that I am not letting off the hook just because I'm not giving the story full attention.
In one of the many inversions of the original "Hush", Hush leaves the Joker for dead with Batman being the only one who can save him, as opposed to nearly killing him like before. And apparently, this pisses off the entire Bat-family who act like this is the worst thing Bruce has ever done. By the way, all the Bat-books post "Hush 2" show everyone on good terms so again, no point. So what is the reason Batman would save the Joker? Simple: because he's Batman.
Despite not being part of his inception and the movies playing fast and loose with it, Batman's no-kill rule is a fundamental part of the character. Now people point out he'll do everything to criminals just short of killing, the exaggerated takedowns from the Arkham games being a prime example. That's not to say Bruce won't lose his composure if pushed too far; it's part of the humanity that makes the character relatable. But as much as he was born from violence, Batman was also born from compassion. Bruce's crusade is about preventing anyone from suffering a loss like him due to crime and that those who would commit those crimes have justice served against them. That's part of why he deals with the revolving doors of Blackgate and Arkham; despite all evidence to the contrary, he hopes to all hell that his enemies, even someone like the Joker, can find repentance. As for letting someone die from something you weren't responsible for, that doesn't matter to Bruce. In his mind, the blood would be just as much on his hands.
There's a flashback scene from the first issue of Tom Taylor's current Detective Comics run where Bruce's father Thomas performed surgery on a man (who we learn would turn out to be Joe Chill) after a car accident despite seeing evidence he was physically abusive to his pregnant girlfriend. Some of Thomas' colleagues and his wife question his decision to save him. A young Bruce overhears the conversation between his parents and is also curious about his father's actions. Thomas responds "We don't know how a life will be lived. We don't know it's value. And if we can save a life, and we don't, what would that make us? You save the life, Bruce. No matter what." As a doctor, Thomas took the Hippocratic oath. Bruce lives by that in his own way. It's something he's also passed down to Dick. In another flashback scene from Taylor in his prior run on Nightwing, a young Dick gets heated during a training session with Bruce, who needs to bring him back down. He tells his ward that they don't know the circumstances that brought someone to crime and that their job is to stop criminals, not punish them; "We can't hurt people because our parents died."
Above everything else wrong with it, I think that's the main reason I reject "Hush 2". In any other story, Bruce's friends and family would understand without question why he would save the Joker's life. He's even done it before like in 2001's "Last Laugh" event where Bruce had to resuscitate the Joker after Dick beat him to death believing he had Tim killed (though if anything it was about keeping blood off Dick's hands). Or even in the original "Hush" where Bruce nearly took it himself, Gordon appeared to talk him down. Considering the Joker crippled his daughter in "The Killing Joke" and killed his wife at the end of "No Man's Land", Gordon would have every right to want the Joker dead but didn't want to see Batman cross the line. Like many superheroes, Batman is supposed to represent the best of humanity and stir that goodness in others, fictional or otherwise. In these days where it's a fight to keep that belief alive, we need stories and symbols that remind us of that.
